BACK
TO NEWS
News
Reproductive Justice and A Comprehensive Social
Justice Ethic
By Reverend Carlton W. Veazey, President and CEO,
Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice
This essay appears in "Dispatches from the Religious Left," a volume
of diverse views on "the future of faith and politics in America,"
edited by Frederick Clarkson and published by Ig Publishing, Brooklyn, New
York. Available from www.amazon.com
It is time for the progressive faith community to affirm reproductive justice
as inseparable from all of our social justice concerns.
Probably the most insidious strategy of the Religious Right has been to
use reproductive rights as a wedge issue to divide progressives, and we have
not handled this as well as we might have. Fortunately, there is a framework
that I believe can help us to overcome our divisions and become better, more
effective advocates for our values. This model, the reproductive justice framework,
is an idea that resonates broadly across our culture and deeply within our
faith traditions and offers religious progressives the opportunity to take
a fresh look at reproductive issues and incorporate them into a "Religious
Left" agenda.
This is a logical and necessary step in the development of a consistent
progressive ethic because reproductive justice underlies and is connected
to many of the social justice concerns that progressive religions espouse.
In addition, the conditions to achieve reproductive justice are virtually
the same as those in other priority areas of interest to the "Religious
Left": universal health care, the eradication of hunger, eliminating
violence, reducing income disparities, improving environmental quality, and
increasing security through peace at home and abroad, some of which will be
addressed in this essay. I believe that including reproductive justice among
these concerns will address the issues of many people who are now not receptive
to a “Religious Left” agenda.
The California-based organization Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice1,
which developed this framework, stipulates that reproductive justice is inherently
connected to the struggle for social justice and human rights. There are two
main modes of thought that reproductive justice incorporates: “reproductive
health” emphasizes the necessary health care services that women need
and “reproductive rights” emphasizes universal legal protections
such as Roe v. Wade. The reproductive justice framework addresses structural
barriers to reproductive health and rights (restrictive laws and lack of access,
for example) and envisions the complete physical, mental, and spiritual well-being
of all people. It is a broad and compelling concept: it says that reproductive
justice will be achieved when all people have the economic, social, and political
power and resources to make healthy decisions about their bodies, sexuality,
and reproduction.
The prospect of reproductive justice is hopeful – as contrasted with
being mired in irresolvable debates about abortion or singling out "pieces
of a woman's body" (as Evelyn Shen of Asian Communities for Reproductive
Justice says). This framework opens up a deeper discussion that allows us
to connect traditional religious concerns such as poverty, violence, hunger,
poor healthcare, unequal educational opportunities, and gender and racial/ethnic
inequality to reproductive issues. Reproductive justice may be the guiding
principle that will allow us, at last, to be able to convey a theological
basis, from our respective religious traditions, for public policies that
enable women to make reproductive decisions, including decisions for abortion,
as well as for providing the health, educational and other resources for healthy
and wanted pregnancies and strong families.
Here are some sound reasons for the "Religious
Left" to include reproductive justice on its agenda:
• Connecting the issues makes each stronger: Keeping
the focus limited to abortion and what is termed the unborn child is a barrier
to addressing broader justice issues such as poverty alleviation, universal
health care, and child development. For example, the growing environmental
health movement is raising awareness about the dangers of chemical exposure
to male fertility and to pregnant women, developing fetuses, and young children
. (Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, “Reproductive Rights
in an Era of Toxic Chemicals,” Perspectives #2, March 27, 2006) As Sister
Joan Chittister writes,2 a nation that considers itself religious would want
to provide "the corporal works of mercy" such as healthcare, housing,
food and clean water. "After all, food and education and decent housing
and support services are exactly the things that take the strain off families
and make abortion unnecessary," she writes.
• Removing barriers to progress: The intensity around
the abortion issue has been a barrier to making progress in expanding access
to birth control and family planning, funding comprehensive and medically
accurate sex education in public schools, and developing and marketing improved
forms of contraception. Consequently, the United States has one of the highest
teen pregnancy rates, unintended pregnancy rates and abortion rates among
industrialized countries and an epidemic of sexually transmitted infections
that affects the ability to have children and increases the risk of serious
diseases such as cervical cancer.
• Increasing understanding of “values”:
The misperception in 2004 that abortion was a chief concern of "values
voters" has had negative consequences for women's health issues, which
are connected to other social justice issues. Too many politicians took this
fallacious interpretation of the vote as permission to retreat from safeguarding
legal abortion and supporting measures to protect women's health. Several
ill-conceived legislative proposals were introduced that focused narrowly
on abortion reduction without seriously addressing the prevention of unintended
pregnancy. An empowered "Religious Left" would expose such political
pandering around the issue of abortion and reinforce that the “values”
of great importance to most Americans include economic equality, peace, and
a clean environment, and that these are all intimately connected to reproductive
health.
• Building political support: Political leaders may
increase their support for prevention when religious constituencies speak
out in favor of such programs as family planning, health services, and sex
education and relate them to concerns such as poverty alleviation and child
health.
• Reinforcing the meaning of religious freedom: The
opposition to comprehensive sex education, HIV/AIDS prevention that includes
condom education, emergency contraception and legal abortion comes from religious
groups that claim these violate religious beliefs – the underlying message
being that the only valid religious beliefs are theirs. The failure to appreciate
and articulate religious pluralism as a powerful value often leads to capitulation
and compromise on reproductive issues with factions that do not honor differing
value systems inherent in our religiously plural society, as well as the value
of religious pluralism itself.
A Religious Left that is unwaveringly committed to protecting religious freedom
and enabling religious pluralism to flourish should speak with one voice against
all attempts to violate church/state separation, including in areas of reproductive
decision-making.
Even as we work to embrace reproductive justice as a logical expression
of our religious values, having a serious dialogue in religious and political
circles on reproductive justice will be challenging. The issue of abortion
has created fear and division among progressives and hampered our efforts
to forge a broad movement for justice that includes both women's rights and
religious organizations. So-called “renewal groups” that use the
abortion issue to create divisiveness in mainline Protestant denominations
and Catholic and evangelical groups that oppose abortion can be expected to
resist efforts to broaden the discussion to connect to other social justice
issues. But research shows that the public is tired of the seemingly unending
divisiveness on abortion and would like positive programs to support healthy
and wanted pregnancies, keep young people in school, expand healthcare, and
strengthen families. With that in mind, the "Religious Left" should
move ahead in specific areas to incorporate reproductive justice in a comprehensive
ethic of social justice.
Creating the Conditions for Strong Families and Wanted Children
Religions including The United Methodist Church, the Presbyterian Church (USA),
The Episcopal Church, the United Church of Christ, Unitarian Universalism
and all branches of Judaism agree that human life is sacred - and include
the life of the woman as well as the potential child. It is because of this
belief that many religious communities work for a world in which every child
is wanted, loved and cared for and support birth control, family planning,
safe and legal abortion, and health care for all.
The reality, though, is that 82% of the approximately 750,000 teen pregnancies
in the United States each year are unintended, with lifelong consequences
for the teen mothers and their families. According to the National Campaign
to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, teen pregnancy is closely linked
to a host of other critical social issues - poverty and income disparities,
overall child well-being, out-of-wedlock births, responsible fatherhood, health
issues, education, child welfare, and risky behaviors. In addition, there
are more than 500,000 births a year from pregnancies that women themselves
say they did not want at the time of conception or in the future. These children
are particularly vulnerable. For example, even when taking into account various
social and economic factors, women experiencing an unplanned pregnancy are
less likely to obtain prenatal care. Their babies are at increased risk of
being born prematurely and at a low birth weight and are also less likely
to be breastfed. And they are more likely to face a range of developmental
risks such as poorer physical and mental health compared to children born
as the result of an intended pregnancy.
Creating the Conditions for Responsible Parenting
An enduring commitment to family relationships is a bedrock religious value
yet many current social policies have the effect of weakening families because
of a lack of regard for reproductive justice. Again, unintended and unwanted
pregnancies put women and families at risk for numerous problems that are
intertwined with many of the social justice concerns that progressive religions
espouse. Most unplanned births occur to unmarried women, and these families
are more likely to be poor and the children are more likely to drop out of
high school, have lower grade-point averages, lower college aspirations, and
poorer school attendance records. "If more children in this country were
born to parents who are ready and able to care for them,” says the National
Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, “we would see a significant
reduction in a host of social problems afflicting children in the United States,
from school failure and crime to child abuse and neglect."
Creating A Health Care System That Works for All
The call for universal health care is coming from churches, temples, synagogues
and seminaries. Reproductive healthcare is integral to any reasonable definition
of health care -- yet new data indicate that there a growing problem in access
to these services. One consequence, according to the federal Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, is that maternal mortality in the U.S. has been rising
and as of 2004 was the highest it had been since the 70s.5 The maternal mortality
rate among African American women is at least three times higher than among
white women, an indicator of racial disparities in health services. Three
studies have shown that at least 40% of maternal deaths could have been prevented
with improved quality of care. If we are serious about universal health care,
we must advocate for the health and well being of the whole person, including
women's reproductive health care.
Creating A More Just World
Religions understand that the scriptural injunction to love your neighbor
and care for "every living thing that moves on the earth" applies
across national boundaries, and yet 500,000 women die each year in impoverished
and developing countries from pregnancy-related causes, including unsafe and
illegal abortions, pregnancies at very young ages that cause irreparable physical
damage, and pregnancies that occur too frequently. In addition, 9.7 million
children die before they turn 5 years old - nearly 40% in their first month
of life. It is estimated that more than 6 million maternal, newborn and child
deaths would be averted yearly if essential maternal, newborn and child health
and nutrition interventions were implemented at scale.7
Throughout the world, women's struggle for dignity includes the ability to
consent to sex, to have a decision in childbearing, and to be able to care
for themselves and their families. Healthy families are key to economic progress.
These are values that are integral to an agenda for peace and sustainable
global environmental practices.
Conclusion
The current and prospective Religious Left faces a significant challenge in
how and even, for some, whether to address reproductive justice. The options
are clear. We can continue to give lip-service to the issues of reproductive
justice. We can reject them as too divisive. Or we can directly address them
because they are of the most profound concern to women and men throughout
the world. If we choose the latter, as I believe we must, our central challenge
is to show how reproductive justice is deeply rooted in our religious values
and to do so in ways that are affirming and respectful of diverse religious
views. I believe we can and we must. Indeed, for us to do anything less is
to risk failing as healers of humanity and prophets of a comprehensive vision
of a just world,
Marjorie Brahms Signer of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice
provided research and editorial assistance in the development of this essay.
|