HOME      PRESS ROOM      CONTACT US      ARE YOU PREGNANT?      SUBSCRIBE     CONTRIBUTE      RESOURCES    SEARCH    
Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice
ABOUT US PERSPECTIVES ISSUES GET INVOLVED PROGRAMS
Social Networking Follow Us on Facebook Twitter

PROGRAMS
Overview
Call to Justice
Clergy for Choice
La Iniciativa Latina
row
Black Church Initiative
line
Generation to Generation
line
Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom
My Sisters' Keeper

PROGRAMS  |  CLERGY FOR CHOICE

Clergy Consultation Service on Abortion: A Brief History

Congresswoman Louise Slaughter Pays Tribute in Congressional Record

One of the little known facts about the dark days when abortion was illegal was that hundreds of clergy came together in a volunteer network to provide compassionate counseling and spiritual support to women.

May 21, 2007, marks the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the Clergy Consultation Service on Abortion, a network initially formed by 21 ministers and rabbis to assist women seeking safe, secure, and low-cost abortions and to provide advice on such alternatives as adoption and parenting. The service eventually grew to include about 1,400 clergy across the nation, who referred thousands of women to doctors in the U.S. and abroad, and became the forerunner of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.

In 1967, when the service was established in New York City, the only legal reason for performing an abortion in New York State was to save the life of the woman. It was estimated that criminal abortions exceeded legal ones by a ratio of about 100 to 1. In the United States, more one million women each year were forced to seek illegal abortions, which often caused severe mental anguish, physical suffering, and death. The largest percentage of abortion deaths were among women aged 35-39 with five or six children.

Rev. Howard R. Moody, the senior minister of the Judson Memorial Church in New York City, organized the consultation service. The first public announcement of the consultation service appeared on the front page of the New York Times on May 22, 1967, and quoted Rev. Moody: “If legal therapeutic abortion is not possible, but an abortion is indicated, we will try to get the woman the best possible medical advice to take care of her problem pregnancy. In some instances it is possible we would attempt to facilitate her getting an abortion in a country where it is legal.”

In the 600-word statement announcing the consultation service, the clergy pledged to work for the enactment of a liberalized abortion law in New York State:

“In the meantime,” they said, “women are being driven alone and afraid into the underworld of criminality or the dangerous practice of self-induced abortion.

“Confronted with a difficult decision and means of implementing it, women today are forced by ignorance, misinformation and desperation into courses of action that require humane concern on the part of religious leaders.”

The statement continued:
“We are mindful that there are fully licensed and reputable physicians who in their wisdom perform therapeutic abortions which some may regard as illegal. When a doctor performs such an operation motivated by compassion and concern for the patient, and not simply for monetary gain, we do not regard him as a criminal, but as living by the highest standards of religion and of the Hippocratic oath.

“Therefore believing as clergymen that there are higher laws and moral obligations transcending legal codes, we believe that it is our pastoral responsibility and religious duty to give aid and assistance to all women with problem pregnancies. To that end we are establishing a Clergymen’s Consultation Service on Abortion which will include referral to the best available medical advice and aid to women in need.”

Years later, Rev. Moody recalled:

"As soon as we opened that door, women came from all over the country. They came by plane and train and bus and car and we were deluged. Even though there were 26 ministers and rabbis, we were overloaded. I did counseling six hours a day, five days a week, sometimes six. So I'd call Philadelphia and I'd say to my friend, ‘Look, why are all these women coming to New York to get this information? Why can't they get it there?’ And he said, 'You mean, you want me to do...?' I said, 'Yeah, I want you to do it.' And so then they got trained. It was a very heavy-duty emotional issue, and consequently to have the religious institutions affirming their decision was very important at that time in history.”

“I don't think any other group except religious institutions could have done this.”

Honor these heroic clergy with a contribution to the Rev. Moody Clergy Consultation Fund